Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 25
Filter
1.
Hong Kong Med J ; 26(3): 176-183, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1468777

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated the preparedness of family doctors during the early phase of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in Hong Kong. METHODS: All members of the Hong Kong College of Family Physicians were invited to participate in a cross-sectional online survey using a 20-item questionnaire to collect information on practice preparedness for the COVID-19 outbreak through an email followed by a reminder SMS message between 31 January 2020 and 3 February 2020. RESULTS: Of 1589 family doctors invited, 491 (31%) participated in the survey, including 242 (49%) from private sector. In all, 98% surveyed doctors continued to provide clinical services during the survey period, but reduced clinic service demands were observed in 45% private practices and 24% public clinics. Almost all wore masks during consultation and washed hands between or before patient contact. Significantly more private than public doctors (80% vs 26%, P<0.001) experienced difficulties in stocking personal protective equipment (PPE); more public doctors used guidelines to manage suspected patients. The main concern of the respondents was PPE shortage. Respondents appealed for effective public health interventions including border control, quarantine measures, designated clinic setup, and public education. CONCLUSION: Family doctors from public and private sectors demonstrated preparedness to serve the community from the early phase of the COVID-19 outbreak with heightened infection control measures and use of guidelines. However, there is a need for support from local health authorities to secure PPE supply and institute public health interventions.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Family Practice/organization & administration , Health Care Surveys/methods , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Surveys and Questionnaires , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/statistics & numerical data , Communicable Disease Control/methods , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Disease Outbreaks/statistics & numerical data , Female , Hong Kong/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Physicians, Family/statistics & numerical data
2.
S Afr Fam Pract (2004) ; 63(1): e1-e4, 2021 07 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1335290

ABSTRACT

The effect of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on the mood responses of individuals is an important indicator of how society is coping with the pandemic. Characterising mood responses in a South African sample could prepare clinicians for possible presentations of mental health concerns in general practice. This study described mood responses during COVID-19 Alert Level 1. The sample of 641 participants who completed the Brunel Mood State Scale during November 2020 was drawn from primary healthcare and family medicine clinics and practices in Cape Town. Their mood response profile was described and compared with pre-COVID-19 norms. The mood profile represented an inverse iceberg profile, with mean scores deviating significantly from pre-COVID-19 norms across all six mood dimensions measured. The inverse iceberg profile had been associated with a range of psychopathologies, suggesting an increased risk of psychological disorders. The current profile of mood responses could alert clinicians to the possibility of increased mental health needs of patients. Patient reports of prolonged anxiety and fatigue, particularly when combined with low mood and low vigour, could signal the need for intervention or referral for further mental health support.


Subject(s)
Affect , Anxiety/psychology , COVID-19/psychology , Depression/prevention & control , Family Practice/organization & administration , Adaptation, Psychological , Adult , Anxiety/prevention & control , COVID-19/epidemiology , Depression/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Health/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , South Africa , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
J Am Board Fam Med ; 34(3): 466-473, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1259321

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: A severe surge of the COVID-19 pandemic in spring 2020 infected 33% of the population and caused more than 7000 deaths in the Bronx, NY. The Department of Family and Social Medicine at Montefiore Medical Center rapidly and strategically reconfigured clinical services to meet the needs of patients, communities, and the health system. CLINICAL RECONFIGURATION: Family medicine hospitalist services tripled in size within 2 weeks to cover 71 beds and cared for 447 patients between March 24 and June 10, 2020, of whom 279 (62.4%) had COVID-19. Community health centers reorganized to maintain primary care services, shifting abruptly to telemedicine while maintaining 95% of the previous year's visit volume, and address intensified patient needs related to viral infection and mental health impacts. Core principles for redeployment included role flexibility, communication, responsiveness, and safety and wellness. DISCUSSION: During a pandemic surge, academic family medicine departments have an important role in expanding hospitalist services and redesigning primary care services. The ability to reconfigure work to meet unprecedented demands on health care was facilitated by family medicine's broad scope of practice including training in hospital medicine, interpersonal communication, behavioral health, care across settings, collaborative partnerships with specialists, and adaptability to communities' needs.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Family Practice/organization & administration , Telemedicine , Health Services Needs and Demand , Humans , New York City , Pandemics
5.
CMAJ Open ; 9(2): E324-E330, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1168152

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Virtual care for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) allows providers to monitor COVID-19-positive patients with variable trajectories while reducing the risk of transmission to others and ensuring health care capacity in acute care facilities. The objective of this descriptive analysis was to assess the initial adoption, feasibility and safety of a family medicine-led remote monitoring program, COVIDCare@Home, to manage the care of patients with COVID-19 in the community. METHODS: COVIDCare@Home is a multifaceted, interprofessional team-based remote monitoring program developed at an ambulatory academic centre, the Women's College Hospital in Toronto. A descriptive analysis of the first cohort of patients admitted from Apr. 8 to May 11, 2020, was conducted. Lessons from the implementation of the program are described, focusing on measure of adoption (number of visits per patient total, with a physician or with a nurse; length of follow-up), feasibility (received an oximeter or thermometer; consultation with general internal medicine, social work or mental health, pharmacy or acute ambulatory care unit) and safety (hospitalizations, mortality and emergency department visits). RESULTS: The COVIDCare@Home program cared for a first cohort of 97 patients (median age 41 yr, 67% female) with 415 recorded virtual visits. Patients had a median time from positive testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) to first appointment of 3 (interquartile range [IQR] 2-4) days, with a median virtual follow-up time of 8 (IQR 5-10) days. A total of 4 (4%) had an emergency department visit, with no patients requiring hospitalization and no deaths; 16 (16%) of patients required support with mental and social health needs. INTERPRETATION: A family medicine-led, team-based remote monitoring program can safely manage the care of outpatients diagnosed with COVID-19. Virtual care approaches, particularly those that support patients with more complex health and social needs, may be an important part of ongoing health system efforts to manage subsequent waves of COVID-19 and other diseases.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care/trends , COVID-19 , Family Practice , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Telemedicine/methods , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/therapy , COVID-19/transmission , COVID-19 Testing/methods , Canada/epidemiology , Comprehensive Health Care , Disease Transmission, Infectious/prevention & control , Family Health , Family Practice/methods , Family Practice/organization & administration , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Program Evaluation , Social Support
7.
J Am Board Fam Med ; 34(Suppl): S222-S224, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1099998

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Since December 2019, the dramatic escalation in coronavirus (COVID-19) cases worldwide has had a significant impact on health care systems. Family physicians (FPs) have played a critical role in the coordination of care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In April 2020, we performed an online prospective survey to assess the impact of the pandemic on FPs' practices. RESULTS: Three hundred FPs were included. Mean age was 53.6 ± 13.5 years. Before the pandemic, 60.2% reported >75 outpatient visits/week, which reduced down to an average of <20/week for 79.8% of FPs; 24.2% of FPs discontinued home visits, while for 94.7% of FPs there was a >50% increase in the number of telephone consultations. Concern related to the risk of contagion was elevated (≥3/5 in 74.6%) and even higher to the risk of infecting relatives and patients (≥3/5 in 93.3%). The majority of FPs (87%) supported the role of telemedicine in the near future. Satisfaction regarding the network with hospitals/COVID-19-dedicated wards received a score ≤2/5 in 46.9% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on the working practices of FPs. A collaboration is needed with well-established networks between FPs and referral centers to provide new insights and opportunities to inform future working practices.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , COVID-19/epidemiology , Family Practice/organization & administration , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , COVID-19/psychology , COVID-19/transmission , Family Practice/education , Family Practice/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Personal Protective Equipment , Prospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicine
8.
J Am Board Fam Med ; 34(Suppl): S225-S228, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1099991

ABSTRACT

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, many physicians and health care systems have shifted to providing care via telehealth as much as possible. Although necessary to control spread of the virus and preserve personal protective equipment, this shift highlights existing disparities in access and care. Patients without the skills and tools to access telehealth services may increase their risk of exposure by seeking care in person or may delay care entirely. We know that patients need internet access, devices capable of visual communication, and the skills to use these devices to experience the full benefits of telehealth, yet we also know that disparities are present in each of these areas. Currently, federal programs have given physicians greater flexibility in providing care remotely and have expanded internet access for vulnerable patients to promote telehealth services. However, these changes are temporary and it is uncertain which will remain when the pandemic is over. Family medicine physicians have an important role to play in identifying and addressing these disparities and facilitating more equitable care moving forward.


Subject(s)
Family Practice/organization & administration , Health Equity/economics , Telemedicine/organization & administration , COVID-19/epidemiology , Health Equity/trends , Health Policy/economics , Health Policy/trends , Healthcare Disparities , Humans , Internet/economics , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicine/economics , United States/epidemiology
9.
J Am Board Fam Med ; 34(Suppl): S33-S36, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1099990

ABSTRACT

Despite first trimester abortion being common and safe, there are numerousrestrictions that lead to barriers to seeking abortion care. The COVID-19 pandemic hasonly exacerbated these barriers, as many state legislators push to limit abortion accesseven further. During this pandemic, family physicians across the country haveincorporated telemedicine into their practices to continue to meet patient needs.Medication abortion can be offered to patients by telemedicine in most states, andmultiple studies have shown that labs, imaging, and physical exam may not beessential in all cases. Family physicians are well-poised to incorporate medicationabortion into their practices using approaches that limit the spread of the coronavirus,ultimately increasing access to abortion in these unprecedented times.


Subject(s)
Abortifacient Agents/administration & dosage , Abortion, Induced/methods , COVID-19 , Family Practice/organization & administration , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Physician's Role , Telemedicine/organization & administration , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Family Practice/methods , Female , Humans , Pandemics , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Self Administration , Telemedicine/methods , United States/epidemiology
10.
J Am Board Fam Med ; 34(Suppl): S26-S28, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1099988

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 is primarily a respiratory illness. Historically, upper and lower respiratory illness has been cared for at home or in the ambulatory primary care setting. It is likely that patients experiencing COVID-19-like symptoms may first contact their primary care provider. The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) is a representative sample of patients from the United States that regularly assesses their use of medical care services. We analyzed 2017 MEPS data to determine the number and proportion of patients who were seen in primary care or family medicine ambulatory settings or hospitalized for upper or lower respiratory illness or pneumonia. In a given year, 19.5 million patients are seen by primary care for an upper respiratory illness, 10.7 million patients for bronchitis, and 9 million for pneumonia. In contrast, 890,000 patients are hospitalized with pneumonia. Given that a primary etiology for respiratory illness in early 2020 was SARS CoV-2 (COVID-19), primary care practices likely were the site of first contact for most patients with COVID-19 illness. Unfortunately, there has been inadequate support for in-person and telehealth visits. Primary care clinicians reported serious shortages of personal protective equipment (PPE) and testing capacity. Inadequate reimbursement for telehealth visits coupled with decreased in-person visits put primary care practices at risk of layoffs and closure. Policies related to primary care payment, federal relief efforts, PPE access, testing and follow-up capacity, and telehealth technical support are essential so primary care can provide first contact and continuity for their patients and communities throughout the COVID-19 pandemic response and recovery.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/therapy , Facilities and Services Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Family Practice/statistics & numerical data , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Ambulatory Care/organization & administration , Family Practice/organization & administration , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Infection Control/instrumentation , Infection Control/methods , Infection Control/organization & administration , Personal Protective Equipment/supply & distribution , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Telemedicine/organization & administration , Telemedicine/statistics & numerical data , United States
11.
J Am Board Fam Med ; 34(Suppl): S210-S216, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1099978

ABSTRACT

Certain members of society are disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 crisis and the added strain being placed on already overextended health care systems. In this article, we focus on refugee newcomers. We outline vulnerabilities refugee newcomers face in the context of COVID-19, including barriers to accessing health care services, disproportionate rates of mental health concerns, financial constraints, racism, and higher likelihoods of living in relatively higher density and multigenerational dwellings. In addition, we describe the response to COVID-19 by a community-based refugee primary health center in Ontario, Canada. This includes how the clinic has initially responded to the crisis as well as recommendations for providing services to refugee newcomers as the COVID-19 crisis evolves. Recommendations include the following actions: (1) consider social determinants of health in the new context of COVID-19; (2) provide services through a trauma-informed lens; (3) increase focus on continuity of health and mental health care; (4) mobilize International Medical Graduates for triaging patients based on COVID-19 symptoms; and (5) diversify communication efforts to educate refugees about COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Emigrants and Immigrants , Family Practice/organization & administration , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Refugees , COVID-19/epidemiology , Emigrants and Immigrants/education , Emigrants and Immigrants/psychology , Emigrants and Immigrants/statistics & numerical data , Female , Health Services Accessibility/economics , Humans , Male , Ontario/epidemiology , Pandemics , Refugees/education , Refugees/psychology , Refugees/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2 , Social Determinants of Health/economics
12.
Eur J Clin Invest ; 50(7): e13303, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1081828

ABSTRACT

This article describes the prospective changes and the fundamental values of the relationships between family doctors, patients and community according to an ethical-social concept of medicine. New aspects of the organization of the activity and of the roles of family doctors are reported in order to build hypotheses pointing to a modern and efficient management of patients in the coming the post-COVID era.


Subject(s)
Community-Institutional Relations , Family Practice/organization & administration , Physician's Role , Physician-Patient Relations , COVID-19 , Delivery of Health Care , Family Practice/methods , Humans , Italy , SARS-CoV-2 , Therapies, Investigational
13.
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med ; 12(1): e1-e3, 2020 Jun 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1073594

ABSTRACT

The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been ravaging Nigeria and the world with increasing morbidity and mortality. Despite efforts by the Nigerian government implemented through the Nigerian Centre for Disease Control (NCDC) to reduce the scourge of the disease through public enlightenment and regular updates, the number of new cases and mortalities from COVID-19 are still increasing. Family physicians (FPs) who are the first contact of care for most patients accessing private and public health facilities in Nigeria have been working tirelessly to reduce the scourge of the pandemic in Nigeria. They continuously update themselves through regular webinars and online resources and guidelines provided by the Society of Family Physicians of Nigeria (SOFPON). Measures adopted by FPs across the country in the fight against the scourge include triaging patients as they present to the family medicine clinics; health education and enlightenment of the populace; and ensuring social distancing, regular handwashing and compulsory use of face mask by both physicians and patients during clinical consultations. Other measures include incorporating family-focused behavioural interventions in their practice, home-based care to reduce the number of persons visiting the hospital, telemedicine and Hospice and palliative care services to the elderly and terminally ill. In conclusion, FPs in Nigeria are helping to reduce the scourge of COVID-19 through patient education and innovative healthcare delivery that does not put patients at increased risk of the disease whilst promptly recognising potential COVID-19 patients and referring them for early diagnosis and treatment.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Family Practice/organization & administration , Physician's Role , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Primary Prevention/organization & administration , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Health Personnel/psychology , Humans , Nigeria , Pandemics , Physicians, Family , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicine/organization & administration
14.
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med ; 12(1): e1-e4, 2020 Jun 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1073592

ABSTRACT

Ten family physicians and family medicine registrars in a South African semi-rural training complex reflected on the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) crisis during their quarterly training complex meeting. The crisis has become the disruptor that is placing pressure on the traditional roles of the family physician. The importance of preventative and promotive care in a community-oriented approach, being a capacity builder and leading the health team as a consultant have assumed new meanings.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Family Practice/organization & administration , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/organization & administration , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Attitude of Health Personnel , COVID-19 , Capacity Building/organization & administration , Clinical Competence , Family Practice/education , Humans , Pandemics , Physicians, Family/organization & administration , SARS-CoV-2 , South Africa
16.
J Fam Pract ; 69(10): 507-513, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-995456
19.
J Prim Care Community Health ; 11: 2150132720957442, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-890049

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has presented new challenges in how Primary Care clinicians care for community patients. Our organization quickly allocated 1 of our community clinic sites into a dedicated COVID Clinic caring for the COVID positive or any patient with COVID like symptoms to minimize contact with the well patients. A prerequisite for all patients to be seen in the COVID Care Clinic was a virtual visit staffed with Advanced Practice Providers that would further determine if the patient needed to seek emergency medical care or be seen in the COVID Clinic. From March 23, 2020 through May 15, 2020, 852 patients with COVID symptoms were seen in this clinic rather than the emergency department. This article describes a collaborative effort to care for a community during the COVID-19 pandemic. This unique setting allowed us to focus an appropriate level of care to a high risk population in a safe and effective manner in the ongoing effort to flatten the epidemiological curve.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care Facilities/organization & administration , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Family Practice/organization & administration , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Minnesota/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology
20.
J Prim Care Community Health ; 11: 2150132720966409, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-873887

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 supportive quarantine care in the community is managed by primary care practices. There is no current guidance on how a primary care practice with high volumes of patients screened for COVID-19 can re-configure itself to become responsive to the pandemic. We examined Learning Health System guidance from the National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine and adapted it to our primary care practice to create an efficient, effective, adaptive response to the COVID-19 pandemic. We suggest evaluating this response in the future for effectiveness and efficiency.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Family Practice/organization & administration , Learning Health System , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL